top of page

Oil & Natural Gas Refining Stuff

Public·30 members

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Part 2

This is a belated follow up to my last posting on Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC). My health is still a limitation and I have also have to work. In this post I will explain more on the innovations both in equipment design and catalyst technology.

Over the past 40 years FCC designs have proliferated with new innovations to increase flexibility of operation and widen the product scope.

FCC’s are primarily a gasoline machine that also produces some olefinic LPG and a rather poor quality diesel fraction. There is now significant progress being made with new FCC designs that increase feedstocks for petrochemical production, boost gasoline octane, and process poorer quality feedstocks, including atmospheric residue. New catalysts have been developed that can work in conjunction with new hardware designs, that dramatically widen the operating envelope. 

Historic FCC becomes the R2R (2 regenerators)
Historic FCC becomes the R2R (2 regenerators)

Huge leaps in catalyst technology have been made that can extend the life of the catalyst, tolerate…



51 Views
Mike
Mike
3 hours ago

Stephen, I have learned more about refining and processing the nasty stuff I spent my entire life looking for because of you. Thank you. We are very fortunate for you to be willing to share this with us. Fortunate indeed. I hope you are holding up OK and God Bless you, sir.

Fluid Catalytic Cracking part 1

My apologies of the rather long interlude from my last posting. I am not getting any younger and some health issues have had to take precedence. The good news is that I now appear to have reached a stable plateau for the time being (until next time).

In this briefing I will go into detail on Fluid Catalytic cracking which is one of 3 main technologies for upgrading heavy distillates.

As usual I have attached the full presentation to the post- see bottom.

Exxon developed the first FCC (model 1) at Baton Rouge LA in 1942.  Since then FCC technology has evolved via many iterations. Primarily a process for gasoline production, it extended the amount of gasoline that could produced from a barrel of oil. Notwithstanding the FCC gasoline has very desirable octane values which reduced the overall demand for octane boosting additives.

FCC’s also produce significant amounts of olefinic…


623 Views
Mike
Mike
Feb 09

Stephen, thank you. We are so fortunate that you have chosen this place to share your experience and knowledge. Everyone is always relieved to hear something other than my repetitious ranting, thank you.


I am with HIH and hoping you are holding it together the best you can. We are pulling/praying for you here.


Mike

Bottom of the barrel processing

My original intention was for the next discussion to be on cracking processes, but in retrospect it would be better to discuss what is required to crack hydrocarbons to produce usable transport fuels.

In the early days of refining the refineries we geared up to produce naphtha, kerosine, diesel and atmospheric residue. The atmospheric residue was frequently used as fuel oil for power generation, steam production and marine applications ( steam turbine and marine diesels).  This type of processing was known as hydroskimming. In the developed world very few hydroskimming  refineries now exist as these refineries cannot extract the value in the atmospheric residue or residual fuels. In the 1960 many refineries were fitted out with vacuum distillation units and fluid catalytic cracking units (FCC). Sometimes a thermal cracker or vis-breaker were also employed. In the 1970’s hydrocracking and coking became available as the demand for ever more gasoline and…


1755 Views
p.jackson.pointers
p.jackson.pointers
Nov 19, 2025

thanks, very in-depth explanation, including the historic and evolution of industry.


may take a couple more readings to fully appreciate.

Chevron El Segundo Fire


El Segundo Refinery Fire

 

There has been muted press output on the El Segundo refinery fire the same news line being copied to many reports.

 


1059 Views
dckpttn
Oct 06, 2025

Thank you very much. Highly enlightening. Given that others are moving out and Chevron has already moved its headquarters to Texas, I think it is 50-50 whether they repair El Segundo or leave.

bottom of page