As is usual, the entire commentary is valuable and worth reading (download at their website). Here are a few relevant bits (the rest that follows it G&R's writing, not mine):
+++++++
The Permian Rolled Over
First, U.S. shale oil production turned negative year-on-year in October. We first forecast this outcome back in 2019, arguing that shale output would begin to roll over around 2026.
We later pulled that estimate forward to 2025—and events now suggest that call was on target. Several years ago, well before today’s AI enthusiasm, we built a deep-neural-network model to parse the drivers of shale productivity. That work proved invaluable.
The model made clear that most of the productivity gains the industry celebrated were not the result of breakthrough drilling techniques, but rather of something far more prosaic: high-grading. Companies were drilling their best remaining locations first.
When we're "spoilt for choice" for energy sources, coal gets pushed aside in favor of sources that are supposedly easier on the environment. And it loses vs cheap natural gas all the time. But, if it's really greenhouse gas we're afraid of, I can't find anyone who will give me a comparison between the short term impact of burning methane, which supposedly puts way more GHG into circulation short term, compared to burning coal, which has way more energy but also puts more CO2 into the environment but over the longer haul. Since most people seem to only focus on the next few months or maybe years, that seems relevant. Bottom line, my personal opinion is that price will decide. When, not if, nat gas prices ramp to double digits in this country again we'll see a lot of fans show up for coal. The dirty little secret of the data centers is that even the ones who talk about being "net zero" use diesel to back up their renewable power supply.